ڕۆناڵد بەشداربووە لە کۆمپانیای DualShockers کە زیاتر لە دە ساڵ ئەزموونی هەیە لە ڕووماڵکردنی یارییە ڤیدیۆییەکان. لە ساڵی ٢٠١٣ لە ڕێگەی مەکۆی گشتی و پێداچوونەوە و هەواڵ و پارچە بۆچوونەکانەوە دەستی بە نووسین کردووە لەسەر یارییەکان، پێش ئەوەی لە ساڵی ٢٠١٥دا بچێتە ناو نووسینی یارییە پیشەییەکان، کارەکانی لەسەر یارییەکان وەک میدیایەکی هونەری تێکەڵ دەکات، ئەزموونی پیشەسازی درێژخایەن لەگەڵ پاشخانێکی زانستی سیاسی و ئابووری و وانەوتنەوە تێکەڵ دەکات.
Given the ever-present differences in perspective between players and critics, it's common to see video games whose ratings can range from mediocre to cult classic.
Considering the interactive medium's inherently subjective nature, very few works achieve absolute consensus on their quality, whether high or low, while most are caught between two opposing forces.
The existence of said duality doesn't imply a bad title, but rather one that appeals to a particular segment of the gaming audience, or even one that arises from updates over time or a specific cultural phenomenon.
As a political science graduate, I am always intrigued by video games that seek to explore their nature; that's why I like Reigns, that's why I like The Witcher, and that's why I like Reigns: The Witcher.
I am fully aware that the mechanics of moving cards from left to right are not very exciting for many, but the number of paths and possibilities presented by this new interpretation of Andrzej Sapkowski's world is magnificent for those of us who are used to reading.
Its puzzles and decisions are quite tricky, especially due to the need to balance your main stats depending on the paths you take, and even its simple combat system requires being attentive so as not to lose foolishly.
Reigns: The Witcher isn't the ultimate herald of strategy in any of its variants, but when playing casually on mobile during downtime, it becomes an extraordinary companion.
سەرچاوەی فەرمی بە زمانی ئینگلیزی: https://www.dualshockers.com/strategy-games-where-the-user-score-is-higher-than-the-critic-score/
